| |
|
|
|
The Pacific Northwest
Literary Potpourri
|
FEEDING INSTRUCTIONS
by Mary Kelly
He read it again: Feeding Instructions. It seemed like
it said the same thing yesterday, but how could he be sure? If the
words kept changing, moving, altering the construction of their
underlying meanings, if how we understood them now was a stunted
mutation of what they once might have encompassed, how would he
know? How could he know? He knocked on his head with his fist
until he felt a thrumming like a tuning fork. He thought if he
took all the things about him that were bad and shameful and
disgusting, the things he did to his own body, the things he
imagined doing to other people's bodies, the respective phenotypes
of solitude and privacy, he would have a mound of clay out of
which to shape femurs and vertebrae, to mold a shape that was the
manifestation of his true self, a figure sloped and small and
grotesque, shed of all contrivance, the isolated and condensed
infection that constituted his soul. He wondered when these became
the words he knew, the meanings he understood--if words in books
rearranged and cannibalized themselves over time, then this was
how knowledge progressed, not towards greater and greater
complexity, but towards greater and greater simplicity, by
attrition, by absence, by the subtraction of information, entire
passages swallowed up by one another when the books were at rest.
He couldn't prove it. Though he read his own books over and over,
they were familiar only to the degree anything is familiar--the
words seemed the same, they seemed to match his memories, but if
any words or meanings were missing, so was his knowledge of them,
and he had nothing by which to recognize the absence. And if every
book continued to shrink, the breadth of its knowledge contracting
when he wasn't looking, he was the inevitable result of that
terminally devolving interaction. He felt certain he understood
the opposite meanings contained in the word "feeding" as it was
presented to him now, the way hunger and sickness are the same,
certain that he and his figure embodied such an inversion,
suspected that he, his body, his walking, waking life was little
more than the shadow thrown or the footprints left behind or the
whorls in the fingerprints or the mind of the figure, a negative
template, the empty space of the groove itself, the memory--and
what was memory but a form of hunger?--and he wondered for what
felt like the first time if it is in this way that we invent and
remember God. He read it again.
####
Mary
Kelly most definitely is.
GO TO NEXT PAGE
|
|